<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blurb&#8217;s BookSmart is a Bummer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:20:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MaryRC</title>
		<link>http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryRC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytechdiva.com/?p=30#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Booksmart has quite a few glitches, not the least of these is slow speed on anything but the latest and greatest computer. But when you do get your book ready to publish, it&#039;s not worth it.

Blurb has no quality control. The second time I ordered from them, my three books were bound together wrong. They had attached the wrong half of each book, so that they were mixed up — all three books. I explained the problem, but Blurb would not believe me and demanded that I send a scan of the problem.

I explained that I did not have access to a scanner and gave a detailed description of the error they made. They replied that they would not accept my word for it and that I would have to prove there was an error by either giving them a scan or by returning the books.

Since I didn&#039;t trust Blurb with my only proof of their error, I decided it wasn&#039;t wise to return the books. So I borrowed a scanner and spent nearly two hours scanning in three 30-page books which had been put together wrong.

I did not want Blurb to say my scans weren&#039;t good enough, so I made high-quality ones. After a long and difficult upload, I e-mailed the 300 dpi PDF files to Blurb proving that I am not lying about their error. But despite all my efforts, I have no confidence that Blurb will admit their error and send replacements. They have no respect for their customers&#039; word, their customers&#039; money, their customers&#039; time, or their customers&#039; satisfaction.

By the way, the binding is already falling apart. So much for the quality of their work in that respect as well. Besides all this, Blurb never admitted any possibility of their having made an error. Their e-mails said they were sorry that I HAD A PROBLEM with the quality. They placed the blame entirely on my not liking the results and would take no responsibility for having bound the books completely wrong.

Until this happened, I had planned to complete several more projects with Blurb. I had also told several of my friends about Burb and was helping one of them complete a wedding book for her son. Now, however, I am sorry I ever did business with Blurb. I hope my friends, once they have heard what Blurb put me through, will decide not to do business with that company, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Booksmart has quite a few glitches, not the least of these is slow speed on anything but the latest and greatest computer. But when you do get your book ready to publish, it&#8217;s not worth it.</p>
<p>Blurb has no quality control. The second time I ordered from them, my three books were bound together wrong. They had attached the wrong half of each book, so that they were mixed up — all three books. I explained the problem, but Blurb would not believe me and demanded that I send a scan of the problem.</p>
<p>I explained that I did not have access to a scanner and gave a detailed description of the error they made. They replied that they would not accept my word for it and that I would have to prove there was an error by either giving them a scan or by returning the books.</p>
<p>Since I didn&#8217;t trust Blurb with my only proof of their error, I decided it wasn&#8217;t wise to return the books. So I borrowed a scanner and spent nearly two hours scanning in three 30-page books which had been put together wrong.</p>
<p>I did not want Blurb to say my scans weren&#8217;t good enough, so I made high-quality ones. After a long and difficult upload, I e-mailed the 300 dpi PDF files to Blurb proving that I am not lying about their error. But despite all my efforts, I have no confidence that Blurb will admit their error and send replacements. They have no respect for their customers&#8217; word, their customers&#8217; money, their customers&#8217; time, or their customers&#8217; satisfaction.</p>
<p>By the way, the binding is already falling apart. So much for the quality of their work in that respect as well. Besides all this, Blurb never admitted any possibility of their having made an error. Their e-mails said they were sorry that I HAD A PROBLEM with the quality. They placed the blame entirely on my not liking the results and would take no responsibility for having bound the books completely wrong.</p>
<p>Until this happened, I had planned to complete several more projects with Blurb. I had also told several of my friends about Burb and was helping one of them complete a wedding book for her son. Now, however, I am sorry I ever did business with Blurb. I hope my friends, once they have heard what Blurb put me through, will decide not to do business with that company, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John K.</title>
		<link>http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>John K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytechdiva.com/?p=30#comment-266</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m 92 and definitely not intuitive about computers, BUT I&#039;ve got a 250-page text and 50 pictures in a memoir of my brother who was a painter and killed in action when the artist of the International Brigade in the Spanish Civil War of 1936-38.  I&#039;m trying to use blurb - just want to be able to drop the pictures into the text at the appropriate places.  Can&#039;t figure it out.  Is there another program that would be better?  I use an iMac with a 27-inch screen.  I  love  it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m 92 and definitely not intuitive about computers, BUT I&#8217;ve got a 250-page text and 50 pictures in a memoir of my brother who was a painter and killed in action when the artist of the International Brigade in the Spanish Civil War of 1936-38.  I&#8217;m trying to use blurb &#8211; just want to be able to drop the pictures into the text at the appropriate places.  Can&#8217;t figure it out.  Is there another program that would be better?  I use an iMac with a 27-inch screen.  I  love  it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Stewart</title>
		<link>http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytechdiva.com/?p=30#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Indeed.  I am creating a 250 page BLOG to BLURB Book.  The blog coversion was rubbish for a start but what can you do.  The software is painfully slow but I am committed now.  I have transferred and formatted January to May and need to get it finished.  I am not starting again.  I am using Snow Leopard on a 2.93Ghz dual core iMac with 4Gb RAM which is plenty.  The software is disgustingly slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  I am creating a 250 page BLOG to BLURB Book.  The blog coversion was rubbish for a start but what can you do.  The software is painfully slow but I am committed now.  I have transferred and formatted January to May and need to get it finished.  I am not starting again.  I am using Snow Leopard on a 2.93Ghz dual core iMac with 4Gb RAM which is plenty.  The software is disgustingly slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytechdiva.com/?p=30#comment-243</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve done many books with Blurb and I agree with another poster...something has changed. I&#039;m trying to do a book now with the latest version of Booksmart 2.5.1 and it has slowed to a crawl.  Loading an image to a page takes like 10 seconds.  This wasn&#039;t the case in the past.  Maybe it has something to do with Snow Leopard?  I run an Imac 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 4GB of ram. That should be more than enough system for BookSmart.  I&#039;ve used other online book makers and Blurb&#039;s products have been best but if my experience continues I&#039;m going to have to start looking for another vendor.  And I won&#039;t be buying a PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done many books with Blurb and I agree with another poster&#8230;something has changed. I&#8217;m trying to do a book now with the latest version of Booksmart 2.5.1 and it has slowed to a crawl.  Loading an image to a page takes like 10 seconds.  This wasn&#8217;t the case in the past.  Maybe it has something to do with Snow Leopard?  I run an Imac 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 4GB of ram. That should be more than enough system for BookSmart.  I&#8217;ve used other online book makers and Blurb&#8217;s products have been best but if my experience continues I&#8217;m going to have to start looking for another vendor.  And I won&#8217;t be buying a PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tunedin</title>
		<link>http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>tunedin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytechdiva.com/?p=30#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Thanks for comments Jessica. The print quality, hard cover and binding on my only Blurb book so far is superb. If you know of a publisher package with the variety of sizes and styles that Blurb offers, and runs well on a Mac please let me know. Unlike my desktop PC I can take my Mac to anywhere in the house and work away on-line. Unfortunately I cannot say I&#039;ve been intuitive with computers all my life, valve radios maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for comments Jessica. The print quality, hard cover and binding on my only Blurb book so far is superb. If you know of a publisher package with the variety of sizes and styles that Blurb offers, and runs well on a Mac please let me know. Unlike my desktop PC I can take my Mac to anywhere in the house and work away on-line. Unfortunately I cannot say I&#8217;ve been intuitive with computers all my life, valve radios maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytechdiva.com/?p=30#comment-226</guid>
		<description>@tunedin It&#039;s great that the PC version runs well for you.  However, I feel that if a company is going to put out multi-platform software, it should perform the same on every platform.   I hate Java-based software as a rule...I&#039;d much rather have things programmed natively for a platform because you are much less likely to run into issues like I did with Blurb.

The common denominator of my complaints are NOT due to my Mac.   I have no trouble running ANY other software on my Mac.  That includes Final Cut Express, the Adobe Suite, etc.  Blurb was a major disappointment, not just from a performance level but from an ease of use level.  I&#039;m very intuitive with computer programs--have been all my life--and Blurb is just not very user-friendly in its current incarnation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tunedin It&#8217;s great that the PC version runs well for you.  However, I feel that if a company is going to put out multi-platform software, it should perform the same on every platform.   I hate Java-based software as a rule&#8230;I&#8217;d much rather have things programmed natively for a platform because you are much less likely to run into issues like I did with Blurb.</p>
<p>The common denominator of my complaints are NOT due to my Mac.   I have no trouble running ANY other software on my Mac.  That includes Final Cut Express, the Adobe Suite, etc.  Blurb was a major disappointment, not just from a performance level but from an ease of use level.  I&#8217;m very intuitive with computer programs&#8211;have been all my life&#8211;and Blurb is just not very user-friendly in its current incarnation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tunedin</title>
		<link>http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>tunedin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytechdiva.com/?p=30#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Blurb is fantastic on a PC. I bought a mac book Pro to use Final Cut Pro. Its only ok with 2gigs ram. The Blurb download was slow, but the the screen on the mac is not suitable for colour balance anyway so I&#039;m staying with my pc. The common denominator of all the complaints is Mac not Blurb. Keychain password popups are a major nuisance, I&#039;v tried everything to get rid of them with no success. I thought spending a load of cash on a mac would smooth my digital world but now I think my Dell pc rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blurb is fantastic on a PC. I bought a mac book Pro to use Final Cut Pro. Its only ok with 2gigs ram. The Blurb download was slow, but the the screen on the mac is not suitable for colour balance anyway so I&#8217;m staying with my pc. The common denominator of all the complaints is Mac not Blurb. Keychain password popups are a major nuisance, I&#8217;v tried everything to get rid of them with no success. I thought spending a load of cash on a mac would smooth my digital world but now I think my Dell pc rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TikiPundit</title>
		<link>http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>TikiPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytechdiva.com/?p=30#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Ditto.  The download of Booksmart was fast, and that was the last fast I saw.  I&#039;m looking at a soft-cover book of 150 pages, and the Booksmart application is just not going to cut it.

Something has changed.  I built and printed a book using earlier versions of the Mac OSX and Booksmart, and it was palpably fast.

Now, with new versions of both, the Booksmart app is disgustingly slow.  I&#039;m on the verge of deleting the app and trying for a book-publishing service elsewhere.

Really -- it&#039;s like using PageMaker in 1992 on a Commodore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto.  The download of Booksmart was fast, and that was the last fast I saw.  I&#8217;m looking at a soft-cover book of 150 pages, and the Booksmart application is just not going to cut it.</p>
<p>Something has changed.  I built and printed a book using earlier versions of the Mac OSX and Booksmart, and it was palpably fast.</p>
<p>Now, with new versions of both, the Booksmart app is disgustingly slow.  I&#8217;m on the verge of deleting the app and trying for a book-publishing service elsewhere.</p>
<p>Really &#8212; it&#8217;s like using PageMaker in 1992 on a Commodore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytechdiva.com/?p=30#comment-136</guid>
		<description>This software flat out stinks. I&#039;ve been working on a 40 page book on this and everything you pointed out is what I&#039;m going through. It freezes literally every 3 seconds so something as simple as moving the type cursor will be a chore. If you&#039;re just going to plop in photos, this software is fine. If you intend to have text as well, be prepared for MAJOR frustration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This software flat out stinks. I&#8217;ve been working on a 40 page book on this and everything you pointed out is what I&#8217;m going through. It freezes literally every 3 seconds so something as simple as moving the type cursor will be a chore. If you&#8217;re just going to plop in photos, this software is fine. If you intend to have text as well, be prepared for MAJOR frustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aquascottk</title>
		<link>http://dailytechdiva.com/blurbs-booksmart-is-a-bummer/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>aquascottk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytechdiva.com/?p=30#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Booksmart software has been great. It downloaded immediatley, and has been simple and fun to set up and create. I have since done 2 books and sent out some as presents which have been received with praise. I highly recommend this program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Booksmart software has been great. It downloaded immediatley, and has been simple and fun to set up and create. I have since done 2 books and sent out some as presents which have been received with praise. I highly recommend this program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
